Skip to content

Upton Village

South Oxfordshire

  • Home
  • News
    • ‘Upton News’
    • Village News
    • Welcome to Upton
    • Local News
    • St Mary’s News
    • Obituaries
    • Didcot News
    • Oxfordshire News
    • Theatre Club News
    • Village Hall News
    • Wine Club News
    • Youth News
  • Events
  • Parish Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Council Decision Making
    • Council Finance
    • Council Lists and Registers
    • Members and Employees
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Priorities and Plans
  • Amenities
    • Postal Services and Local Post Offices
    • St Mary’s
    • The George at Upton
    • Village Hall
  • Organizations
    • Afternoon Drop In
    • Film Club
    • Friends of St Mary’s
    • HUGS
    • Karate Club
    • Oil and Gas Syndicates
    • Tea Birds WI
    • Wine Appreciation Club
    • Inactive Organisations
      • 50s Club
      • The Upton Coven
      • Theatre Club
      • Village Volunteers
  • Information
    • District and County Council Information
    • Upton Recreation Ground Rules
    • Travel
  • History
  • Photos

Minutes of the meeting of the Parish Council 29.04.2026

May 18, 2026

UPTON PARISH COUNCIL

Draft Minutes of the Meeting Held on Wednesday 29th April 2026

Held in the Small Meeting Room, Upton Village Hall at 7.00pm

Present

Cllr Francoise Yates

Cllr Peter Head

Cllr Chris Seelig

Cllr Matt Talbot

In Attendance

Benjamin Shaw – Clerk/RFO
Members of the public

  1. Apologies for Absence

Apologies were received from Cllr David Beckles.

Cllr Matt Talbot advised that he would arrive late due to prior commitments.

  1. Declarations of Interest

No declarations of interest relating to items on the agenda were received at this stage of the meeting.

  1. Open Forum

3.1 The George at Upton – Advance Notice of Events

A resident raised concerns regarding noise associated with events held at The George public house, particularly during weddings and weekend functions. It was noted that, during the previous year, advance notice of such events had occasionally been shared with residents via village WhatsApp groups, which had been appreciated by nearby households.

The resident asked whether a more formal arrangement could be encouraged whereby advance notice of larger events would routinely be communicated to villagers.

Members acknowledged the concern and considered the request reasonable. It was agreed that an informal discussion would be held with representatives of the public house to encourage the continued use of local communication channels, including village WhatsApp and Facebook groups, to notify residents of significant upcoming events where possible.

The resident was advised to report any future issues should communication cease after initial discussions.

3.2 Wattle Cottage Farm – Planning Refusal and Enforcement Matters

Residents raised questions regarding the recently refused planning application relating to Land at Wattle Cottage Farm and asked what actions, if any, could now be taken regarding enforcement and associated concerns.

Cllr Head explained that the Parish Council acts as a statutory consultee within the planning process but does not possess direct enforcement powers. Enforcement action remains the responsibility of the Local Planning Authority and other relevant agencies depending upon the nature of the issue.

It was noted that:

  • The Parish Council had previously submitted formal representations regarding the planning application;
  • The matter would be discussed later in the meeting under Agenda Item 5.2;
  • Concerns raised by residents would be recorded within the public minutes and could assist in evidencing local concerns to relevant authorities.

Residents raised concerns regarding:

  • Highway and child safety;
  • Animal welfare;
  • Burning of waste and potential environmental impacts;
  • Obstruction of public rights of way;
  • Imported fill material and land alteration.

Cllr Head advised that different matters fall under different regulatory bodies and legal frameworks, including:

  • Planning enforcement;
  • Environmental Health;
  • Countryside Rights of Way services;
  • The Environment Agency.

Members of the public were encouraged to continue reporting specific incidents, particularly where evidential records such as photographs or dates could assist relevant authorities.

Cllr Head further advised that:

  • The planning process is necessarily procedural and can be lengthy;
  • The Parish Council would continue to advocate on behalf of residents within its legal remit;
  • Ongoing concerns regarding national planning policy, local government reorganisation, and protections affecting the North Wessex Downs National Landscape remained matters of wider concern.

Residents acknowledged that the matter was likely to remain a long-term issue requiring continued monitoring and engagement.

No further questions were raised during the Open Forum.

  1. Planning

The Chair (Cllr Yates) proposed, with the agreement of Members, to bring forward Agenda Item 5.2 to allow members of the public present to hear the discussion. This was agreed Unanimously.

5.2 Decision Notice – Land at Wattle Cottage Farm, Prospect Road, Upton

The Council noted the refusal of planning permission by Vale of White Horse District Council in respect of application P25/V2762/FUL, relating to Land at Wattle Cottage Farm, Prospect Road, Upton.

Members discussed the current position regarding enforcement case VE24/201 and related matters. The Clerk reported that no formal enforcement action was currently shown as having been taken, but that this was not unexpected given the recent refusal decision and the procedural requirements that may apply.

Cllr Head advised that the Parish Council had previously objected to the application and that the reasons for refusal reflected a number of concerns previously raised by the Council, including flood risk, impact on the North Wessex Downs National Landscape, highway safety, biodiversity, countryside impact, and the intentional unauthorised nature of the development.

Members discussed the importance of maintaining a collaborative and constructive relationship with the Local Planning Authority, while continuing to represent the concerns of residents. Cllr Head reported that a draft letter had been circulated to Members prior to the meeting, addressed to the Development Management Team Leader at Vale of White Horse District Council, regarding enforcement and related matters.

Members also discussed whether correspondence should be copied to:

  • District Councillors;
  • the County Councillor;
  • the relevant planning case officer; and
  • the North Wessex Downs National Landscape Team.

It was noted that, although the North Wessex Downs National Landscape Team is not an enforcement body, its management plan and comments may be relevant to planning matters affecting the protected landscape.

The Council further noted that residents had raised concerns during the Open Forum regarding safety, animal welfare, burning of waste, environmental impacts, public rights of way, and imported fill material. It was acknowledged that these issues may fall under different statutory regimes and may involve different authorities.

RESOLVED:
That Upton Parish Council write formally to the Development Management Team Leader at Vale of White Horse District Council regarding enforcement case VE24/201 and related matters, and that the Council authorise associated correspondence with other relevant authorities and stakeholders as deemed appropriate.

The letter shall be circulated to Members by email for any final comments or amendments before being sent within five days of circulation.

The correspondence shall be copied, as appropriate, to the North Wessex Downs National Landscape Team, Ward Members, the County Councillor, and the relevant case officer.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Seelig.
Carried unanimously.

5.1 P26/V0730/FUL – Maslina, Reading Road, Upton, Didcot OX11 9JJ

The Council considered planning application P26/V0730/FUL for the demolition of the existing house and outbuilding and the erection of a replacement self-build dwelling at Maslina, Reading Road, Upton.

Members noted that the site is located on the A417, adjacent to The George and Dragon, and backs onto land previously known as Wattle Cottage Farm. The proposal was described as a replacement residential dwelling rather than a wholly new residential use.

Members discussed the scale of the proposed dwelling, noting that it represented a significant increase in size compared with the existing property. The Council also noted that the site lies within the North Wessex Downs National Landscape, formerly the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and that the Council had previously agreed to have due regard to the relevant management plan in planning matters.

Members considered the following matters:

  • the scale and massing of the proposed dwelling;
  • whether the design was in keeping with the surrounding area;
  • potential impacts on neighbouring amenity;
  • landscape impact within the National Landscape;
  • lighting and potential light spill, particularly given dark skies considerations;
  • the proposed landscaping and replacement of existing conifers;
  • drainage and increased hardstanding;
  • potential gravel migration onto the A417;
  • construction traffic and highway safety;
  • the need for an appropriate Construction Traffic Management Plan.

Members noted that the applicant appeared to have engaged with pre-application advice and that the design had been amended from an earlier, larger proposal. Members were generally supportive of the principle of a replacement dwelling but considered that additional safeguards and clarification were required.

The Council discussed submitting a neutral response of no objection, subject to comments and requested conditions.

The Council considered that the Local Planning Authority should satisfy itself in relation to:

  • the adequacy of the landscape and visual assessment;
  • lighting design and compliance with relevant National Landscape guidance;
  • drainage arrangements and the impact of additional hardstanding;
  • tree protection and replacement planting;
  • the timing of landscaping works to provide screening at an early stage;
  • construction traffic management;
  • prevention of loose gravel migrating onto the public highway;
  • any ecological or biodiversity requirements.

During discussion, a member of the public indicated that they wished to comment. The Chair proposed that the meeting be suspended briefly to allow public participation.

RESOLVED:
That the meeting be suspended to allow a member of the public to speak.

Proposed by Cllr Yates.
Seconded by Cllr Head.
Carried unanimously.

The meeting was suspended.

[20:03] The meeting resumed.

The meeting was reinstated.

Proposed by Cllr Yates.
Seconded by Cllr Talbot.
Carried unanimously.

Members resumed consideration of planning application P26/V0730/FUL, Maslina, Reading Road, Upton.

Members discussed the need for any response to focus on material planning considerations. The following matters were considered relevant to the Council’s consultation response:

  • Construction traffic management, particularly given the site’s access from the A417;
  • Prevention of gravel migrating from the proposed driveway onto the public highway;
  • Surface water drainage, sustainable drainage arrangements and the increase in hardstanding;
  • Landscape impact within the North Wessex Downs National Landscape;
  • Lighting impact and potential light spill arising from extensive glazing;
  • Retention and protection of trees during demolition and construction;
  • Replacement planting and screening;
  • Biodiversity net gain calculations;
  • Protection and replacement of bat roosting opportunities.

Members noted that the submitted bat survey identified existing bat roosting features and that the Council wished the Local Planning Authority to satisfy itself that appropriate mitigation and replacement roosting provision would be secured and checked.

Members also noted that the application deadline appeared to have been extended to 16th May 2026, although the agenda had recorded the deadline as 29th April 2026. It was therefore agreed that Cllr Head would circulate a draft response to Members for comment before submission.

RESOLVED:
That Cllr Head circulate a proposed consultation response to Members regarding planning application P26/V0730/FUL, and, following consideration of Members’ comments, submit the response on behalf of Upton Parish Council.

The Council’s response would be on the basis of no objection, subject to comments and requested conditions addressing the matters discussed.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Carried unanimously.

Members then returned to the remaining agenda items, it having been agreed earlier to bring forward Item 5 to allow members of the public to hear the planning discussion.

A matter was then raised regarding a previous planning response relating to Prospect Road, which it was suggested may not have been submitted. The Clerk undertook to check the position and, if necessary, request that a late submission be accepted.

The Clerk noted concerns regarding workload and available contracted hours. It was suggested that this matter should be considered separately by the Council.

Cllr Talbot proposed that the meeting be suspended.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Carried unanimously.

The meeting was suspended.

The meeting resumed following the informal discussion.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Talbot.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Clerk’s Report

The Clerk provided a report regarding progress on the proposed land acquisition and associated legal and financial matters.

The Clerk reported that:

  • extensive correspondence and updates had been circulated to Members by email;
  • the lender had approved the current documentation in principle;
  • the Council’s solicitor had confirmed that the transaction was capable of proceeding, subject to execution of the necessary documents and funding arrangements;
  • anti-money laundering checks had been completed satisfactorily;
  • source of funds verification remained in progress but no concerns had been identified;
  • exchange and completion were currently anticipated within approximately four to eight weeks, subject to all parties being ready.

Members discussed:

  • execution arrangements for legal documents;
  • correspondence address arrangements relating to the loan documentation;
  • insurance requirements;
  • access arrangements;
  • permissive path considerations;
  • boundary matters;
  • drainage, easements and utility infrastructure;
  • indemnity insurance and caution against first registration;
  • land management and future use considerations.

Members noted concerns regarding the use of the Clerk’s correspondence address on legal documents and requested that clarification and advice be sought from the Council’s solicitor regarding whether an alternative correspondence address could be used following completion.

The Council further noted:

  • that there appeared to be no significant contamination concerns associated with the land;
  • that no invasive plant species had been identified during site inspection;
  • that public liability insurance would be required from exchange of contracts;
  • that future permissive path arrangements would be considered separately following acquisition;
  • that the Community Land Working Group would continue to develop recommendations for future management of the site.

The Council noted the information provided and indicated that the identified risks were considered proportionate and manageable in the context of the proposed acquisition.

 

  1. Use of Loan, Donations and Council Reserves

The Council considered the proposed allocation of funding sources in line with the DLUHC borrowing approval.

RESOLVED:
That:

  1. The private loan facility (up to £90,000) shall be applied solely towards the purchase price of the land and associated acquisition costs; and
  2. All post-completion expenditure shall be funded from donations and/or Council reserves and not from the loan facility.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Execution of Legal Documents

The Council considered arrangements for the execution of:

  • the Contract for Sale;
  • the TP1 Transfer Deed; and
  • the Loan Agreement.

It was noted that the documents would require execution as deeds in accordance with the Council’s Standing Orders and relevant legislation.

Members agreed that the documents would not be signed during the meeting and would instead be reviewed and executed separately.

RESOLVED:
That:

  1. The Contract for Sale, TP1 Transfer Deed and Loan Agreement shall be executed as deeds on behalf of the Council;
  2. Execution shall be by any two Members of the Council;
  3. The signatures of those Members shall be witnessed by the Proper Officer; and
  4. The Clerk be instructed to liaise with the Council’s solicitor regarding the execution arrangements and related matters.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Authority to Proceed to Exchange and Completion

The Council considered delegated authority arrangements relating to the proposed land transaction.

Members further discussed:

  • indemnity insurance;
  • caution against first registration;
  • access matters;
  • funding transfer arrangements; and
  • procedural requirements relating to exchange and completion.

RESOLVED:
That delegated authority be granted to the Clerk, in consultation with the Chair or another Member where necessary, to:

  • finalise terms with the Council’s solicitor;
  • proceed to exchange of contracts;
  • arrange payment of the required deposit; and
  • complete the transaction,

subject to:

  • legal advice confirming readiness;
  • funding arrangements being in place; and
  • remaining within the period of DLUHC borrowing approval.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Talbot.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Exchange and Completion Timing

The Council noted legal advice regarding the recommended timing between exchange and completion and discussed arrangements relating to:

  • loan drawdown;
  • transfer of funds;
  • exchange timing; and
  • completion dates.

The Council agreed that the advice of the Council’s solicitor should be followed regarding the scheduling of exchange and completion.

RESOLVED:
That exchange and completion shall proceed in accordance with the advice of the Council’s solicitor.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Anti-Money Laundering and Member Compliance

The Clerk confirmed that:

  • appropriate anti-money laundering and due diligence checks had been undertaken;
  • no concerns had been identified;
  • the Council’s solicitor had also undertaken the required checks; and
  • no Member present was disqualified under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.

The information was noted.

 

  1. Risk Assessment and Instructions to Solicitor

The Council considered the remaining risks associated with the transaction, including:

  • access arrangements;
  • utility and easement matters;
  • indemnity insurance;
  • permissive path considerations; and
  • land registration matters.

Members considered the risks proportionate and manageable.

RESOLVED:
That the Council, having considered the solicitor’s Report on Title and associated advice, considers the remaining risks proportionate and manageable and confirms instructions to the solicitor to proceed with the transaction.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Head.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Insurance and Site Management

The Council considered:

  • insurance arrangements from exchange of contracts;
  • permissive access arrangements;
  • land management considerations; and
  • future working group proposals.

RESOLVED:
That:
(a) the Clerk/RFO be authorised to arrange appropriate landowner’s and public liability insurance from the date of exchange of contracts; and
(b) the Council supports, in principle, the continuation of permissive public access arrangements, with detailed proposals to be brought back to Council at a future meeting.

Proposed by Cllr Seelig.
Seconded by Cllr Talbot.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Exclusion of Public and Press

The Council determined that exclusion of the public and press was not required.

Items 15 and 16 were therefore not considered.

 

  1. Finance and Administration

The Council noted the balances as at 31 March 2026:

  • Treasurer’s Account: £9,639.81
  • Business Bank Instant Account: £93,350.36
  • Total Funds Available: £102,990.17

17.1 Authorisers

It was agreed that Cllr Talbot and Cllr Seelig would act as authorisers for the next month’s payments.

17.2 Approval of Payments

The Council approved the payments listed within the agenda papers.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Seelig.
Carried unanimously.

17.3 Bank Reconciliation

The Council approved the bank reconciliation to the end of March 2026.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Head.
Carried unanimously.

17.4 Expenses

No expenses were submitted for approval. Deferred to the next meeting.

17.5 Salary Payments

The Council approved salary payments in accordance with contractual obligations.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Seelig.
Carried unanimously.

The Clerk advised that the forthcoming audit period and associated finance work would place additional demands on Clerk hours during the coming month.

 

  1. Recreation Ground

The Council received an update regarding the recent playground inspection. Members noted that:

  • no significant safety concerns had been identified;
  • a minor issue with play equipment had already been repaired locally; and
  • the overall inspection outcome was satisfactory.

The Council discussed access arrangements for preparations relating to the forthcoming Uptonogood event.

Members considered whether temporary access should be granted to named volunteers for access to the recreation ground and garage facilities, subject to appropriate safeguards.

Following discussion:

RESOLVED:
That temporary ad hoc access be granted to named Uptonogood volunteers for a limited period, subject to:

  • submission of an appropriate risk assessment;
  • compliance with Council requirements regarding vehicle access and safety; and
  • return of keys/access arrangements following the event period.

Proposed by Cllr Head.
Seconded by Cllr Yates.
Two votes in favour, with one abstention from Cllr Seelig.
Motion carried.

 

  1. Upton News

Members agreed that contributions to Upton News would include:

  • an update regarding the Wattle Cottage Farm planning and enforcement matter;
  • a brief update regarding progress on the community land acquisition; and
  • continued encouragement for residents to consider joining the Parish Council.

 

  1. Personnel Committee and Staffing Matters

The Council discussed arrangements for the Clerk’s annual appraisal and noted that advice would be sought from OALC regarding process and timing.

20.1 Personnel Committee Membership

RESOLVED:
That:

  • Cllr Yates step down from the Personnel Committee; and
  • Cllr Seelig and Cllr Head join the Personnel Committee alongside the existing membership.

Proposed by Cllr Talbot.
Seconded by Cllr Head.
Carried unanimously.

 

  1. Date of Next Meeting

The next full meeting of Upton Parish Council will be held on Wednesday 27th May 2026 at 7.00pm in the small meeting room at Upton Village Hall.

The meeting closed.

 

Filed Under: Draft Minutes

Draft Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting 25 February 2026

March 25, 2026

UPTON PARISH COUNCIL

Draft Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting

Held on Wednesday 25 February 2026 at 19:00
Small Meeting Room, Upton Village Hall

 

Present

Cllr Peter Head
Cllr Chris Seelig
Cllr Matt Talbot
Cllr Francoise Yates (Chair)

Clerk & Responsible Financial Officer: Benjamin Shaw

 

County Councillor Rebecca Fletcher

  1. Apologies for Absence

Apologies were received from Cllr David Beckles.

  1. Declarations of Interest

No declarations of interest were made.

  1. Public Participation (Open Forum)

No members of the public were present.

  1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting

The minutes of the meeting held on 28 January 2026 were considered.

Minor typographical amendments were noted including correction of names and removal of references identifying parishioners.

RESOLVED:
That the amended minutes of the meeting held on 28 January 2026 be approved as a correct record.

Proposed: Cllr Peter Head
Seconded: Cllr Chris Seelig
Vote: Unanimous

  1. Planning

5.1 New Planning Applications

No new planning applications had been received since publication of the agenda.

5.2 Updates on Previously Considered Applications

P25/V2762/FUL

The Council noted a significant number of public representations submitted in relation to the application.

Members noted the Council had previously submitted comments including concerns regarding the highway assessment and ownership assumptions referenced within the applicant’s submission.

No further action was required at this stage.

P26/V0101/PIP

Members noted that Planning in Principle consent had been granted by the Local Planning Authority.

It was noted that a subsequent detailed planning application will follow and the Parish Council will have the opportunity to comment further at that stage.

5.3 Circulation of Draft Planning Responses

The Council considered a request that draft planning responses prepared under delegated authority be circulated to councillors prior to submission.

Members agreed that circulation of draft responses represents good governance practice and allows councillors an opportunity to comment where time permits.

5.4 Planning Application P26/V0126/HH – Failure to Respond

The Clerk reported that the Council had not submitted a response within the consultation period for the above application.

Members noted:

  • The application was received close to the consultation deadline.
  • The shortened consultation period limited the ability to convene a meeting within statutory notice requirements.
  • No request for an extension to the consultation period had been made to the Local Planning Authority.

The matter was noted and it was agreed that the Council’s planning procedures and delegation arrangements would be considered under Item 9.1.

  1. District Councillor Report

No District Councillor was present and no report was received.

  1. County Councillor Report

The County Councillor attended and provided an update covering:

  • Highways maintenance and pothole repairs
  • Impacts of prolonged wet weather on road conditions
  • Proposed improvements to the FixMyStreet reporting system
  • Flooding issues affecting locations within the wider area
  • Planned highway works including closures affecting the A417

Members raised concerns regarding:

  • Flooding on local roads
  • Drainage issues affecting a public right of way and adjacent ditch
  • The condition of certain local roads

The County Councillor agreed to investigate the drainage issue and report back.

The Chair thanked the County Councillor for attending.

  1. Village Matters

8.1 Recreation Ground Grounds Maintenance Contract

The Clerk reported that TFM had submitted its best and final offer.

Following comparison of quotations, Scofell remained the lowest cost provider for the required specification.

RESOLVED:
To appoint Scofell as grounds maintenance contractor for the Recreation Ground.

Proposed: Cllr Chris Seelig
Seconded: Cllr Matt Talbot
Vote: Unanimous

8.2 Volunteer / Working Groups

Play Area Working Group

Interest in volunteering will be explored through the forthcoming Village Survey and publicity in Upton News.

Community Land Working Group

Members noted that establishment of this group will follow completion of the land purchase process.

8.3 Tree Works / At-Risk Trees

The Clerk reported on quotations received from Michael Wilson for safety works.

RESOLVED:
To approve expenditure of £1,000 for priority safety works to remove dangerous branches overhanging the playground and recreation areas.

Proposed: Cllr Matt Talbot
Seconded: Cllr Francoise Yates
Vote: Unanimous

Further works will be considered in the new financial year.

 

8.4 Play Area – Maintenance and Safety

Swing Beam Replacement

Quotations are being obtained and will be circulated once received.

Trim Trail Rope Adaptation

Consideration deferred pending further inspection.

Inspection Rota

Routine playground inspections are continuing.

8.5 IT & Website Migration

The Council received an update on the hosting support ticket and progress toward the .gov.uk migration.

It was noted that new requirements under the 2025–26 Practitioners’ Guide (Assertion 10) will require the Council to demonstrate:

  • Ownership and use of a council domain for email and website;
  • Compliance with accessibility standards (WCAG 2.2);
  • Adoption of an IT policy.

The Council confirmed that:

  • The Council already owns and uses a .gov.uk domain for email, and councillors have appropriate email accounts in place, placing the Council in a strong position compared to other parishes.
  • Full migration of the village website is not required. Only statutory and transparency content (e.g. agendas, minutes, and governance documents) must be hosted on a .gov.uk domain.

Members discussed current issues and required actions, including:

  • Inconsistent and outdated domain registration (WHOIS) information across platforms;
  • Discrepancies in Clerk and contact details held by external bodies;
  • Legacy access, outdated software, and security concerns within existing systems;
  • The need to retain historic domains to prevent third-party use.

It was reported that initial improvements have already been made, including email security enhancements.

The Council agreed that:

  • A new, standalone .gov.uk website should be created to host Council documents only, with links from the existing village website;
  • This approach avoids disruption to the main village website while ensuring compliance;
  • Accessibility requirements will apply only to the new Council site.

Further actions were identified:

  • Completion of a full audit of domains and hosting arrangements;
  • Updating Clerk and Council contact details with all relevant external bodies;
  • Updating domain registration records (including via Nominet where required);
  • Reviewing ICO registration status;
  • Identifying and adopting a suitable IT policy;
  • Scoping costs and options for the new website.

It was noted that there is no fixed statutory deadline, but the Council must demonstrate awareness, progress, and a clear plan to the auditor.

Resolved:
To proceed with the outlined actions, including development of a .gov.uk-hosted Council website and associated compliance work, and to receive a further report with costings and options in due course.

8.6 Machinery Servicing and Security

The Council received a report following the February servicing of grounds maintenance equipment.

It was reported that:

  • The John Deere ride-on mower has been serviced and returned, having received a light service. An invoice is awaited.
  • The strimmer (Stihl) remains with the service provider and may be beyond economic repair. Further updates are awaited.

Members noted that:

  • A potential write-off may be required if the strimmer cannot be repaired;
  • Any disposal must be properly recorded and reflected in the asset register for audit purposes;
  • Both items are currently included on the asset register (as confirmed from the last audit).

The Council discussed budget implications and the need to allocate costs appropriately within grounds maintenance or recreation budgets.

Resolved:

  • To note the report;
  • To await confirmation on the strimmer condition and associated costs;
  • To ensure any write-off or replacement is properly recorded in the asset register and considered within future budget planning.

8.7 Village Survey

The Council received an update on the development of the village surveys.

It was reported that:

  • Both the Neighbourhood Plan survey and the Playground survey have been revised, trialled, and condensed (with the playground survey reduced to six questions);
  • A parishioner is leading on survey design and has secured a small team of volunteers to assist with delivery and data input;
  • Evidence suggests that in-person distribution will achieve significantly higher response rates than online methods, particularly given the village demographic.

Members discussed key considerations, including:

  • Whether responses should be collected per household or per individual.
    The general consensus was that a household response would be more practical and consistent;
  • The preferred method of distribution, with support expressed for door-to-door delivery and engagement;
  • The potential use of printed copies, with printing to be arranged locally and costs reclaimed where appropriate;
  • Limited value in paid online survey tools, though email or website links may still be used to supplement engagement;
  • Opportunities to encourage volunteer involvement via community groups and online platforms.

It was noted that:

  • The final survey content must be reviewed by Council prior to distribution and included in a future agenda as an appendix;
  • Draft surveys will be circulated to members in advance for comment.

Resolved:

  • To support the principle of in-person survey distribution using printed copies;
  • To proceed on the basis of one response per household (subject to final confirmation);
  • To receive the draft surveys for review ahead of the next meeting, where final approval will be considered.

8.8 Parish Emergency Plan

The Council considered an initial framework for updating the Parish Emergency Plan.

It was reported that:

  • A review has been undertaken of the Oxfordshire County Council Community Resilience standards (2026);
  • While there is no statutory requirement, maintaining a Parish Emergency Plan is considered best practice;
  • A proportionate, practical, and GDPR-compliant plan is required, avoiding unnecessary complexity.

Members noted that:

  • Existing templates (including Government guidance) are available but may be adapted to suit the scale of the parish;
  • A concise and usable document is preferred, focusing on key actions and local response arrangements.

A proposal was outlined to:

  • Establish a Community Resilience Working Group;
  • Comprise approximately three councillors, supported by community volunteers where appropriate;
  • Undertake initial drafting, data gathering, and engagement work, before submitting a draft plan to the Clerk for compliance checks and subsequent Council approval.

Members were invited to review the proposed Terms of Reference ahead of the next meeting.

It was further noted that:

  • Audit and governance commitments in the coming months may affect councillor availability;
  • Volunteer support from within the village may be explored, subject to formal Council agreement.

Resolved:

  • To defer formal establishment of the working group to the next meeting;
  • That members review the draft Terms of Reference in advance;
  • To include this item on the next agenda for decision.

8.9 Recreation Ground Signage

The Council received an update on volunteer-led repair works to signage at the recreation ground.

It was reported that:

  • Repair works have been delayed due to adverse weather conditions.

Resolved:
To note the update and await further progress once conditions allow works to proceed.

  1. Governance

9.1 Delegated Decision-Making Arrangements (March 2020)

The Council received and noted the Clerk’s Governance Note regarding the delegated decision-making arrangements adopted on 19 March 2020.

Members were reminded that:

  • The 2020 arrangements were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to enable decision-making (including email voting and delegation to the Clerk) where in-person meetings were not possible;
  • Guidance received from Oxfordshire Association of Local Councils indicates that such arrangements have not universally been rescinded, but current legislation requires that formal decisions of a parish council must be made at a properly convened public meeting.

The Council considered:

  • Whether email-based decision-making and delegation to a small number of members remains lawful or appropriate;
  • The governance risks associated with continuing to rely on pandemic-era arrangements not reflected in current Standing Orders;
  • The practical implications for responding to planning applications within statutory timeframes.

It was noted that:

  • The Council’s current Standing Orders (as reviewed and adopted in 2025) do not include provisions for email voting or the 2020 emergency delegation;
  • There is uncertainty as to whether such provisions existed in earlier versions of the Standing Orders, but they are not present in the current adopted version;
  • Email exchanges do not constitute a lawful public meeting;
  • Decisions taken outside a properly convened meeting may not be legally robust, particularly where deadlines prevent later ratification.

Members expressed a preference for strengthening governance and ensuring compliance ahead of the forthcoming audit.

Resolved:

  • To formally rescind the delegated decision-making arrangements adopted on 19 March 2020 insofar as they relate to decision-making by email or informal member agreement;
  • To confirm that Council decisions must be made at properly convened public meetings in accordance with legislation and Standing Orders;
  • To note that where time constraints prevent a meeting, the Council may:
    • Request an extension from the relevant authority; or
    • Choose not to submit a corporate response where appropriate;
  • To instruct the Clerk to bring forward to the next meeting:
    • Draft options for a scheme of delegation to the Clerk for defined circumstances; and/or
    • Draft Terms of Reference for a Planning Committee (minimum three members);
    • Clarification on procedures for requesting extensions to planning deadlines;
  • To require that any future external governance advice obtained on behalf of the Council is shared with all members in full.

Proposed: Cllr Peter Head
Seconded: Cllr Chris Seelig
Vote: Unanimous

9.2 Oxfordshire Unitary / “Ridgeway Council” Consultation

RESOLVED:
To delegate authority to Cllr Peter Head to prepare and submit the Council’s consultation response, with the draft to be circulated to councillors prior to submission.

Proposed: Cllr Chris Seelig
Seconded: Cllr Francoise Yates
Vote: Unanimous

9.3 National Planning Policy Framework Consultation

RESOLVED:
To delegate authority to Cllr Peter Head to prepare and circulate a draft consultation response for review prior to submission.

Proposed: Cllr Francoise Yates
Seconded: Cllr Matt Talbot
Vote: Unanimous

  1. Finance & Administration

10.1 Authorisation of Payments

Cllr Matt Talbot was appointed as payment authoriser for March 2026.

10.2 Approval of Payments

The schedule of payments totalling £1,524.65 was reviewed.

RESOLVED:
To approve the payments as listed.

Bank interest of £17.51 was noted.

10.3 Citizens Advice Donation

RESOLVED:
To approve a donation of £100 to Citizens Advice.

Proposed: Cllr Francoise Yates
Seconded: Cllr Chris Seelig
Vote: Unanimous

10.4 SLCC Membership Renewal

RESOLVED:
To approve renewal of SLCC membership (£215).

Proposed: Cllr Peter Head
Seconded: Cllr Chris Seelig
Vote: Unanimous

10.5 Bank Reconciliation

The bank reconciliation to 31 January 2026 was reviewed and signed.

10.6 Professional Advice Regarding Loan Agreement – Consideration and Next Steps

The Council formally noted the professional advice received from the Clerk & RFO, the Council’s solicitor, and the Oxfordshire Association of Local Councils regarding the requirement for specialist legal advice in connection with the Chapel Furlong land purchase and associated loan agreement.

It was noted that:

  • The Clerk signed the engagement letter with Boyes Turner LLP on 2 February 2026 at the Council’s request;
  • Confirmation of that engagement was received on 11 February 2026;
  • Members stated that the Council had been aligned with the use of specialist legal advice throughout;
  • Concerns raised by members had related not to opposition to legal advice, but to questions of value for money, incomplete information, and the timely circulation of key correspondence and advice.

Members discussed governance, legal, audit, indemnity, insurance, and communication issues arising from the handling of the matter. In particular, it was noted that:

  • Specialist legal representation had been consistently supported by the Council;
  • Clarification that the loan agreement needed to be fully owned and managed by the solicitor had resolved earlier uncertainty;
  • Timely circulation of significant correspondence and written advice to all members would assist effective governance and reduce the risk of misunderstanding;
  • Some concerns were raised regarding communication processes and professional relationships, and it was agreed that clearer written updates would be beneficial going forward.

Following discussion, the Council considered the proposed next steps and agreed to confirm its existing position.

Resolved:

  1. To note that the engagement letter from Boyes Turner LLP was signed by the Clerk on 2 February 2026 at the Council’s request, and that members have been aligned with that instruction throughout.
  2. To formally confirm the instruction to Boyes Turner LLP to act on the Chapel Furlong land purchase, including negotiating and documenting the associated loan agreement within the scope of the engagement letter.
  3. To note the professional advice received from the Clerk, OALC, and Boyes Turner LLP, and to confirm the Council’s support for the recommended approach.
  4. To request that the Clerk provide regular written progress updates to all members on the land purchase, including circulation of significant correspondence as soon as reasonably practicable and normally within two working days of receipt, subject to reasonable officer capacity and working hours.

Proposed: Cllr Peter Head
Seconded: Cllr Chris Seelig
Vote: Unanimous

  1. Upton News

Members agreed that items relating to:

  • pothole reporting via FixMyStreet
  • the village survey
  • volunteer working groups

should be submitted for inclusion in the next edition.

  1. Date of Next Meeting

The next meeting of Upton Parish Council will be held on:

Wednesday 25 March 2026 – 19:00
Small Meeting Room, Upton Village Hall

Filed Under: Draft Minutes

Subscribe to the monthly Upton News by providing your email address here or emailing news@uptonvillage.co.uk

You can read

Oxfordshire County Council news

or

Sign up to County Council residents’ newsletter

Home Library Service

Upton seen in 1930

Panorama of Upton looking north

This photograph of Upton was taken from a point south of the George and Dragon

Read more >

St Mary’s, circa 1900

St Mary's, circa 1900

St Mary's, circa 1900

St Mary’s interior, circa 1900

St Mary's interior, circa 1900

St Mary's interior, circa 1900

© Copyright 2022 Upton Village