Skip to content

Upton Village

South Oxfordshire

  • Home
  • News
    • ‘Upton News’
    • Village News
    • Welcome to Upton
    • Local News
    • St Mary’s News
    • Obituaries
    • Didcot News
    • Oxfordshire News
    • Theatre Club News
    • Village Hall News
    • Wine Club News
    • Youth News
  • Events
  • Parish Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Council Decision Making
    • Council Finance
    • Council Lists and Registers
    • Members and Employees
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Priorities and Plans
  • Amenities
    • Postal Services and Local Post Offices
    • St Mary’s
    • The George at Upton
    • Village Hall
  • Organizations
    • Afternoon Drop In
    • Film Club
    • Friends of St Mary’s
    • HUGS
    • Karate Club
    • Oil and Gas Syndicates
    • Tea Birds WI
    • Wine Appreciation Club
    • Inactive Organisations
      • 50s Club
      • The Upton Coven
      • Theatre Club
      • Village Volunteers
  • Information
    • District and County Council Information
    • Upton Recreation Ground Rules
    • Travel
  • History
  • Photos

Minutes of Meeting 24th September 2008

September 30, 2008

UPTON PARISH COUNCIL

Minutes of meeting of Upton Parish Council held on

Wednesday 24 September 2008 at 8.00 p.m. in the Village Hall

Present: Mr M Brown (Chairman), Mr J Dickens, Ms B Drew, Mr D Mason, Mr S Norman,

Mrs T Seelig (part time), Mr C Lamont (part time), Mrs C. Lightfoot (clerk)

1. Apologies for absence received and accepted from Mr Farrell.

2. Declarations of Interest

Members are asked to declare any personal interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting. None recorded

3. Minutes of meeting of Upton Parish Council held on Wednesday 23rd July 2008. Mr Norman asked that in the penultimate sentence in item 11(i) be amended to read “Mr Norman said this did not seem to be a practicable idea”. With this minor amendment, the minutes having been previously circulated, were signed as a true record by the Chairman.

4. Matters Arising: there were no matters arising.

5. County Councillor’s Report:

Mr Lamont told the meeting that since Oxfordshire County Council now works in partnership with other bodies, ie PCT, Voluntary Sector, Police, Quangos, etc it no longer makes strategic decisions on its own. He said that County Councillors are now removed from representing the people and there is a perceived democratic deficit.

6. Planning Application

UPT/1062/4 – application made by Mr & Mrs E Johnson for erection of a dwelling with garage and erection of a replacement garage at Rowlands, Church Street. The Vale of the White Horse Planning Department has advised that this application has been withdrawn.

UPT/18307/3 – re-application for erection of single 2 storey family dwelling at 1 Beeching Close for Mr Curran. The Chairman and Planning Officer, Ms Drew, had studied the new application which was very similar to the earlier application . The only perceived changes were that the boundary fence had been moved back and the splay at the entrance had been altered. The clerk has responded to the Planning Department reinforcing the comments that had been made to the earlier application.

UPT/8232/4 – application to build summerhouse/store at Manor Lawns for Mr M Collins. The plans were viewed and no objections raised. Clerk to advice the Planning Department accordingly. Clerk

UPT/832/5 – modification of planning obligation – application by Mr R Napper. The Chairman will endeavour to find out the implications of this application and advise councillors by email so that a decision can be made. MB

9. Villagers’ Forum: there were no villagers present.

10. Parish Transport Representatives Report: the clerk advised the meeting that she has asked bus users how the new timetable was working. The cessation of the 9.00 a.m. bus has created the biggest difficulty. She has written to Oxfordshire CC conveying this. In their reply they state that some adjustment to the times might be possible when they undertake a review, usually after about 9 months or so.

11. Reports from Councillors’ on areas of responsibility

i) Roads and Footpaths – nothing new to report. Mr Norman requested that the PC should debate any change of status before implementation be carried out. Complaints have been received about the overgrown footpath at the back of the George & Dragon . The clerk has been assured by the tenant that the footpath is being cut this week.

ii) Recreation Ground: the Chairman reported that the drive belt on the tractor mower had broken. Kalehurst Garden Machinery Ltd will collect the mower to repair and service it. A check will be carried out to determine why the drive belt has broken after only 60 hrs use.

Working parties will be arranged for the morning and afternoon of Saturday 11th October to position slabs in front of the ball wall and to lay safety surfaces beneath the swings and the climbing net. MB

iii) Playground: the ROSPA report was noted. The following items need to be considered: adjustment to gate catch to prevent finger entrapment, height of overhanging branches to be at least 2.4m

iv) Village Hall: The Chairman reported that village contribution to the hall fund has almost reached its original target of £10k.

v) Planning: in light of Ms Drew’s resignation from the Parish Council, Mr Brown agreed to act as councillor responsible for planning until a further councillor is co-opted.

vi) Young Parishioners: Mr Mason said that he is open to suggestions and he hoped to bring a proposal to the next meeting. DM

vii) Communications: the Chairman reported that the web site is undergoing a major revamp and will be back on line any day. (Note – it is back)

viii) NAG: nothing of relevance to Upton to report. Mr Dickens proposed that Mrs Celia Davies,

Neighbourhood Watch Coordinator be invited to attend future meetings. This was agreed.

JD

ix) UKAEA Stakeholders Committee: nothing to report. It was noted that a new nominee is required. Mrs Seelig expressed an interest in taking on the responsibility of representing UPC on this forum, a decision will be made at the next meeting.

x) Playground Management Committee: It is proposed to co-opt 2 new members to this committee to replace Colin Batchelor and Kathryn Fletcher who have resigned. Mrs Seelig to advise the Chairman of anything that needs the attention of the working party. TS

xi) Energy Saving Initiative: Mrs Seelig will pick up on this initiative and report to the next meeting.

TS

13. Finance

i) Invoices and payments since last meeting

Mrs C Lightfoot – donation to village tea party – £10 (paid)

Vale of White Horse – dog bin emptying (April – June) £41.47 + VAT (paid)

Clerk’s Salary – August & September – £311.80 + £24.99 expenses

Vale of White Horse – dog bin emptying (July – Sept) £41.47 + VAT

M. Brown – purchase of petrol for grass cutting £93.91

A. Brown – purchase of items for Tiddleywinks playgroup – £71.86

Playsafety Ltd – fee for annual inspection of play equipment £69.00 + VAT

The above payments were noted and agreed. The Chairman said that receipts and expenditure is in line with budget.

ii) Financial transactions since last meeting

Bank Interest: July 29.48, August £28.99

These receipts were noted. Clerk has invoiced Mr & Mrs Wright for 2 cuts to footpath at the rear of the George & Dragon.

The clerk asked for a nominee to become signatory in place of Ms Drew. Mr Dickens was proposed. Clerk to arrange bank mandate. Clerk

11. Correspondence recently received

i) Letter from Chairman of Vale of White Horse thanking the village for hospitality at Tea Party 29/7/08

ii) invitation to attend Didcot Community Forum meeting on 30 September

iii) invitation to renew subscription to FWAG

iv) SE England Regional Assembly – Partial review of the SE Plan: Gypsy and Traveller accommodation needs. Response to consultation document required by 21 November 08

v) CPRE “Fieldwork” magazine

vi) Guide to Roadsafety in Oxfordshire 2008/9

vii) Joint Strategic Planning Unit – Publication of the joint minerals and waste core strategy DPD

The above items of correspondence were noted.

12. Future of Volunteer Group: the Chairman floated the idea that the Volunteer Group might be set up as a charitable trust. This Group might feed back to the Parish Council ideas on what might be done to improve the village. The idea is to be debated at the next meeting. Clerk

13. Changes on the Parish Council: a letter of resignation from Ms Drew was read. The Parish Council expressed their gratitude to Ms Drew for her contribution and wished her well in her move away from Upton.

14. Date of next meeting. The next meeting has been arranged for 26th November at 8.00 p.m.

There being no further business the Chairman closed the meeting at 10.05 p.m.

Clare Lightfoot, Clerk

Tel: 01235 850486

26th September 2008

Filed Under: Minutes, Parish Council

UPT/832/5 Highams Farm

September 22, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/832/5

Location – Highams Farm.

Application – Modification of Planning Obligation.

Applicant – Mr R. Napper

Application Date Sept 2008

Parish Council Reply – No Objections This involves the swopping of 2 pieces of land such that the size of the farm land in use remains almost as it was when permission was given for the construction of the farm house.

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/18307/3 Beeching Close

September 22, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/18307/3

Location – No 1 Beeching Close.

Application – Erection of a 2 storey dwelling.

Applicant – Mr D Curran

Application Date Sept 2008

Parish Council Reply –

Upton Parish Council are very concerned about the return of this application and would like to be informed why the District Council have accepted it again still containing all the existing omissions and inaccuracies. The only changes we note have added to those inaccuracies since the entrance splay may now be 11m, 33m, 45m or 90m depending on which drawing or document you are reading.

As far as the re-submission goes, we repeat and resubmit all of our objections of our letter of the 2 July with minor changes and the correction of a typing error (it should be 8° not 8%).

We note 2 changes in the re-submission:

1. That the fence has been moved back. Do the Highways Department accept that the fence is now on the site boundary? If so will the Highways Department accept responsibility for the area outside the fence and arrange for the removal of the earth that the Arboricultural Report claims is killing the trees in that area.

2. The entrance splay has been made deeper by 0.4 metres. Such a change is irrelevant, it is not the depth of splay but the number of trees/bushes that have to be cut back and kept cut back that affects the visibility. These trees/bushes are outside the site boundary and are presumably the responsibility of the Highways Department, will they agree to cut them back when they have already stated that it would be detrimental to the area. We object to any removal of bushes or trees from this area.

We cannot comment on the length of the splay as we have no idea from the information pack which drawing or document you are working to. Last time we thought the splay length was meant to be 66 metres but it was shown as 33m or 11m on the drawings this time the confusion is even worse.

May we return to and re-emphasise our objection to the proposed access.

How will the contractors go about constructing the access ramp. We understand that the owner of Beeching Close will not allow it to be used by contractors vehicles, this means that all work in cutting down trees, bringing in materials and levelling with a bulldozer will have to be done direct off Station Road with all contractor vehicles also parked in the road. Since the trees cannot be felled across Beeching Close these will have to be felled down onto the road. Are you thinking of closing the road for a few days when that road is so vital to the community as explained in our letter of July 2nd?

Even after construction an 8° slope is 1 in 7, a very steep slope for heavy contractor and delivery lorries negotiating a sharp bend on a recently laid ramp with a temporary surface trying to turn onto a well used road that is part of a national cycleway with poor visibility. To make it even more dangerous both the road and the ramp have fall-away banks on both sides. The alternative is off-loading in Station Road and using smaller vehicles to take the materials down to the site, for safety reasons this will mean temporary closure of the road.

Will you please ensure that you consult the Health and Safety Dept that will be responsible for the site and if you even consider saying yes to this application please can we have an on-site meeting with a representative of the Highway’s Dept and the Police to satisfy our very strong concerns regarding safety and what appears to be inevitable road closures.

In our 2 July* letter we made it very clear that in our opinion this application is totally unacceptable, this note only deals with the changes in the re-submission and re-emphasises our objection to the proposed access. We are however seriously concerned that you apparently accepted the building, which is totally out of character with the area and with this village and despite all the errors on the plans.

May we repeat our request for a letter from you explaining why you have accepted an application, not once but twice that contains so many inaccuracies, we are fortunate to have a member of our council who is able to fully understand all the drawings, other councils may be less fortunate. If you intend to take any notice at all of Parish Council comments please ensure you send out sensible information.

We are also concerned that these applications are incomplete and that you allow agreements on drainage etc to be secretly negotiated between yourselves and the applicant without any notification to Parish Councils as in the case of Ravello (Chilton Road) and to be repeated in this application.

We want to work with you to achieve better planning for this parish please do not continue to ignore our requests and our grave concerns.

District Council Decision – Permitted with conditions

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/8232/4 Manor Lawns

September 21, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/8232/4

Location – Manor Lawns High Street.

Application – Erection of a Summer House/Store.

Applicant – Mr M Collins

Application Date Sept 2008

Parish Council Reply – No Objections

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

Minutes of Meeting 23rd July 2008

July 28, 2008

UPTON PARISH COUNCIL

Minutes of meeting of Upton Parish Council held on

Wednesday 23 July 2008 at 8.00 p.m. in the Village Hall

Present: Mr M Brown (Chairman), Ms B Drew, Mr D Mason, Mr S Norman, Mrs C. Lightfoot (clerk),

Mr R Farrell (part time), Mr C Lamont (part time), PCSO G Kirby (part time).

1. Apologies for absence received and accepted from Mr Dickens (holiday) and Mrs Seelig (holiday).

2. Declarations of Interest

Members are asked to declare any personal interest and the nature of that interest which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting. None recorded

3. 3. Co-option of additional councillor: The chairman welcomed Mr David Mason to the council.

4. Minutes of meeting of Upton Parish Council held on Tuesday, 13th May 2008 and extraordinary meetings held on Thursday 19th June and Monday 30th June 2008, having been previously circulated, were agreed to be a true record and duly signed by the Chairman.

5. Matters Arising

13/11/07 Field at rear of George & Dragon. In Mr Hood’s reply, dated 22/5/08, he suggested we attend a meeting with him, his officers and the Chairman of the Development Control Committee to discuss on-going concerns. Miss Drew and Ms Alexander of the Wessex AONB have subsequently attended such a meeting at the Vale offices. The Vale will look at case histories to see how chattels have been dealt with in other areas. Ms Drew told the meeting that she is awaiting a response from the Vale setting out issues following the meeting. Ms Alexander is hopeful that she can help us and will go through the Vale’s response with Ms Drew.

13/5/08 Draft Vale Sustainable Community Strategy. Miss Drew circulated the draft document for information.

13/5/08 Vale’s response to Thames Water – report by Mr Norman. Due to an oversight this report was not taken but the matter was discussed by the District Councillor.

6. County Councillor’s Report: Mr Lamont reported:

  • the Great Western Park development at Didcot now has the go ahead;
  • Oxfordshire County Council web site now contains Highways fact-sheets;
  • planning applications are in the pipeline for incinerators to deal with much of the counties waste at both Sutton Courtenay and Ardley.

7. District Councillor’s Report: Mr Farrell reported:

  • In a recently issued government report the Vale is only required to accommodate 60 additional houses on top of the 11,500 that it is already expected to provide by 2026;
  • Sir Michael Pitts’ report on Lessons to be Learned from Floods can be seen on the Vale web site. There are 8 recommendations for Local Government which are likely to have a significant impact on the Vale’s finances. The Government is being asked whether they will help with funding, or alternatively agree to raise the cap on Council Tax;
  • SODC and the Vale have agreed to proceed with joint management arrangements. Three councillors from each council will oversee the process;
  • Thames Water Reservoir: the Vale is not convinced by the case which has been made by TW. The Vale’s final response will be made in August.

8. Planning Application UPT/1062/4 – application for erection of a dwelling with garage and erection of a replacement garage at Rowlands, Church Street. Application made by Mr & Mrs E Johnson. The plans were discussed and it was unanimously agreed that the Parish Council should not object. The clerk was asked to request clarification that the land on which the new property is to be built is not agricultural land. Clerk


The following permissions were noted:

UPT/19332/1 – Alterations to Upton Lodge – Permission granted

UPT/20551 – Change of use of land at Scotlands Ash – Permission granted

UPT/3644/1 – Sign of the Crown – permission has been granted, with conditions prohibiting commercial use.

Request to reduce the crowns on Horse Chestnut and Sycamore trees at Corderoys by 20% – permission granted.

UPT/18307/2 1 Beeching Close, permission has been refused. Mr Farrell will investigate the reason for refusal.

9. Villagers’ Forum

PCSO Kirby briefly attended the meeting to hear if there were any concerns. He said that special attention would be paid to monitoring vehicles traveling illegally on the Sustrans track particularly during the school holidays. The Chairman advised that the most appropriate siting for the SID machine is on the A417 and in Chilton Road

10. Parish Transport Representatives Report: no report

11. Reports from Councillors’ on areas of responsibility

i) Roads and Footpaths – Cycle track to Blewbury: Mr Norman reported that a Blewbury landowner has offered land alongside the A417 for a cycle track between Upton and Blewbury, terminating at the boundary of Upton. Mr Norman said this did not seem to be a credible idea. He will seek a further discussion with those involved in Blewbury. SN

ii) Recreation Ground: the Chairman reported that the grass-cutting arrangements for the recreation ground were working well and he thanked those responsible. He said that some maintenance was required on the garage. MB

iii) Playground: the ROSPA inspection is due this month. The Chairman said that help is required to lay the new safety mats. The Chairman stated that he would continue with the cutting of the stinging nettles and would also cut the hedge, B.D. agreed to help. The membership of the Playground Committee needs to be reviewed. MB & BD

iv) Village Hall: The Chairman reported that an £8,750 grant has been made by the County Council. Our application to WREN is through to the second phase. In this area 2 grants will be awarded from 4 applicants. Donations from the village have exceeded the half-way mark, ie over £5k.

v) Planning: see Item 5. Matters Arising and Item 8

vi) Young Parishioners: nothing to report

vii) Communications and other Amenities (Environmental Project). The Chairman said that he has written to the Highways department regarding the installation of gates in Frog Alley. A reply is awaited.

viii) NAG: no report was available following the last NAG meeting.

ix) UKAEA Stakeholders Committee: Ms Drew said that nothing of direct interest to Upton was discussed at the last meeting.

x) Energy Saving Initiative: no further progress to report.

12. Lead Roles for 2008/9: it was agreed that each lead role should be supported by another councillor as follows:

Planning: Ms B Drew/Mr M Brown

Roads & Footpaths: Mr S Norman/Mr M Brown

Recreation & Playground Mr J Dickens/Mrs T Seelig

Youth Mr D Mason/Mrs T Seelig

Communications & Amenities Mr M Brown/Ms B Drew

Energy Saving Initiative Mrs T Seelig/Ms B Drew

Parish Council representation on other bodies was agreed as follows:

UVHAT Mr S Norman

NAG Mr J Dickens

UKAEA Ms B Drew

Other areas where councillors would be expected to give assistance:

Finance Mr S Norman

Transport Mr J Dickens

Village Workforce Mr M Brown with assistance from Mr D. Mason

13. Finance

i) Invoices and payments since last meeting

Wicksteed – safety mats £777.26.

Payment to Public Works Loans – 30 June – £412.91

Hire of Hall for meetings – £88

Milton Garden Machinery – £369

Mr G de Wilde, contribution towards roller for recreation ground and petrol costs for both mowing and rolling- £55

Allianz Insurance- additional premium for mowers and fidelity guarantee – £27.53

Mr M Brown – grass cutting expenses – £82.64
Clerk’s Salary – June & July & postage – £328.24

The above payments were noted and agreed. It was unanimously agreed to make £10 available towards the village tea party for the elderly and housebound planned for 29th July.

ii) Financial transactions since last meeting

Bank interest – May £31.11 & June £33.46

Repayment of VAT claimed end June – £227.72

These receipts were noted.

iii) Charitable Donations

Request has been received from Oxfordshire Association for the Blind. This will be considered along with other requests at the end of the financial year.

14. Correspondence recently received

ORCC – 10/7/08 – County Council Grant Aid for Village Hall Project – grant of £8,750 has been awarded towards village hall extension project. Clerk to write a letter of thanks. Clerk

Oxfordshire CC – 25/6/08 – Application to add bridleway to the definitive map has been unsuccessful. Noted

VWH – 18/7/08 – Housing needs assessment – survey being carried out. Posters advertising this to be displayed.

Vale Chairman’s letter, 10/6/08, requesting visit to village activities. The Vale Chairman will be attending the village tea party.

CPRE AGM – 26/7/07: noted

The following correspondence will be circulated to councillors:

Oxfordshire 2030 Consultation – draft plan for consultation.

Oxfordshire Highways Annual Report:

Oxfordshire County Council, Countryside Service, Annual Report

ORCC Review, Summer 08

15. Date of next meeting. The next meeting has been arranged for 24th September at 8.00 p.m.

There being no further business the Chairman closed the meeting at 9.50 p.m.

Clare Lightfoot, Clerk

Tel: 01235 850486

27th July 2008

Filed Under: Minutes, Parish Council

UPT/3644/1 Sign of the Crown

June 28, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/3644/1

Location – Sign of the Crown, High Street.

Application – Demolition of existing garage. Erection of detached garage/studio with storage over.

Applicant – Mr and Mrs P. Hardy

Application Date June 2008

Parish Council Reply – No Objection providing the storage area was only used for that purpose.

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/18307/2 Beeching Close

June 22, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/18307/2

Location – No 1 Beeching Close.

Application – Erection of a 2 storey dwelling.

Applicant – Mr D Curran

Application Date June 2008

Parish Council Reply – Object for the following reasons

Application Inconsistencies, Omissions and Errors

There are many inconsistencies, omissions and errors within the application package, it is therefore not possible for us to fully understand what the applicant intends. The Upton Parish Council are concerned that the Planning Dept. will be making a decision based on inaccurate plans and request a response to this point.

· The Design and Access Statement (section 3.2) refers to the proposed building’s frontage being aligned to Station House although the plans show it standing several meters back from the frontage of Station House.

· There are errors between the various plans regarding the line of the existing Beeching Close and the Western side of the site boundary

· The Arboricultural Report suggests Tree Belt 2 may be outside the site boundary although drawing P01 shows a wooden fence apparently including these trees within the site boundary.

· Trees T9 and T10 are included in drawings PO2 and PO5 when they are scheduled for removal in the Arboricultural Report (in this case they are shown to give screening) but they are correctly not included in PO1 (where there is a wish to favourably display the dwelling with more space around it).

· There is no detail included regarding the sewerage connection and drainage considerations.

· The plans do not include mention of the detail that the foundations of the proposed dwelling at the rear of the building will be in the old railway track that has been in-filled.

Access

There is no adequate explanation of the access arrangements during the construction phase of the project although the information given leads to the assumption that the proposed access poses safety concerns for use by construction lorries and other heavy commercial vehicles particularly as it is likely that the larger vehicles will either have to reverse into or out of the site. The level section of the drive prior to entry onto the road is 6m long, not as long as some of the larger vehicles so their rear wheels will still be coming up an 8° slope as well as round a sharp bend as they try to pull out onto the road. The turning onto the road will be very tight as the road is fairly narrow with a steep slope on the other side of the road as well as steep slopes on both sides of the drive. Manoeuvring onto or off the site could be difficult and dangerous as well as cause delays on the main road into the village that is also used by the service and school buses, most domestic traffic. Station Road is also on of Sustrans Route 44 which is heavily used by commuting cycle traffic from the Harwell/Chilton Campus and also recreational cycle traffic.

The documentation provided with the application also includes an appeal against the decision from the County Council regarding the proposed access and includes information on what is considered to be three similar sites where an appeal against refusal has been considered by the Building Inspector. All three are for multi-unit sites exiting onto much busier roads and do not appear relevant to this application.

Proposed dwelling

The dwelling is very large for the site, this is of concern to the Parish Council for various reasons:

· The proposed new dwelling will be the most prominent in Beeching Close as it will stand adjacent to the main entrance into the village and will not be well screened as you approach from the North/West along the A417 or as you approach from the West down Chilton Road. Its sheer size will overwhelm the existing historic Station House.

· A main material used (timber cladding) is not in keeping with neighbouring properties or with the village. Whatever materials are used they must blend sympathetically with the historic Station House and other existing buildings, there is virtually no timber cladding anywhere in the village. .

· With a previous application in this parish we have seen the effect of over-cramming making it very difficult to sell either property at market price.

Tree screening

The Arboricultural Report is found to be inconsistent and incorrect with the following points of concern:

· The report does not mention any new trees/shrubs that are to be used as screening or where they are to be planted.

· The report does not mention the mature and healthy ash in Tree Group 1, a group scheduled for removal.

· Regarding Tree Belt 2, although marked for retention, the report omits to say that several of these trees are badly damaged due to a road traffic accident and subsequent fire, it does, however, say that the soil heaped around the trees will cause further damage and goes on to say replacement should be considered. Thus, marking Tree Belt 2 for retention is misleading as it is not likely that the existing trees will survive.

· The report suggests that Tree Belt 2 may be outside the development area, so there is concern as to why the site owner has been allowed to dump soil around the trees.

· The new access is not only less safe but also requires the felling of a healthy mature ash tree at least one mature Sycamore and two Hawthorn bushes.

· The over large size of the proposed property takes the foundations very close to the trees that are being retained as cover. About three years ago on that same site there was a serious problem of root heave under Station House. Several tress were removed that were much further away from the existing building than the proposed new building will be from the cover trees that will remain on the site. Whilst it is accepted that the new foundations will be deeper and more substantial, the proposed building is too close to the retained trees and shortly after it is built there is a risk of the cover trees interfering with the new building and the occupant requiring them to be felled.

Change of Use of Land

It should be noted that much of the land on which this development will be built was sold to the applicant a few years ago by the County Council with a change of use agreed from roadside verge to use as a garden. We would have expected some constraint imposed by the County Council on any further change of use and we ask for clarification on this point. If it is now to be allowed as building land, the County Council would appear to be guilty of seriously under-selling a publicly owned piece of land.

District Council Decision – Refused The proposed access drive to serve the new dwelling fails to provide adequate visibility splays at its junction with Station Road to the detriment of highway safety. In addition, the provision of adequate visibility splays in this location is likely to result in the loss of further trees along Station Road which would have a harmful impact on the visual appearance and rural character of the area.

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/20551 Little Acorns Nursery

June 22, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/20551

Location – Land at rear of Scotlands Ash.

Application – Change of use from agricultural to the creation of a wildlife area, orchard, play area and vegetable garden for use by Little Acorns Nursery.

Applicant – Mr P. Mansbridge

Application Date June 2008

Parish Council Reply – No Objection

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/2065/13 Upton Lodge

June 21, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/2065/13

Location – Upton Lodge Reading Road.

Application – Work to an existing (redundant) parking area to provide a tennis court.

Applicant – Mr and Mrs Slater

Application Date June 2008

Parish Council Reply – No Objection

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

UPT/19332/1 Corderoys

May 28, 2008

Planning Application No UPT/19332/1

Location – Corderoys, Pound Lane

Application – For the erection of a double garage with studio above.

Applicant – Mr & Mrs Granger,

Application Date – May 08

Parish Council Reply – No objection

District Council Decision – Permitted

Note

All drawings and other hard copy documents connected with the above application will be destroyed after 3 years.

For further information on this application visit www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk and click on Planning and Planning Applications using the above Ref.No.

Filed Under: Planning

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Subscribe to the monthly Upton News by providing your email address here or emailing news@uptonvillage.co.uk

You can read

Oxfordshire County Council news

or

Sign up to County Council residents’ newsletter

Home Library Service

Upton seen in 1930

Panorama of Upton looking north

This photograph of Upton was taken from a point south of the George and Dragon

Read more >

St Mary’s, circa 1900

St Mary's, circa 1900

St Mary's, circa 1900

St Mary’s interior, circa 1900

St Mary's interior, circa 1900

St Mary's interior, circa 1900

© Copyright 2022 Upton Village